ArticlePsychophysiology2025
Spontaneous Modulation of Standard EEG Frequency Bands During a Neurofeedback-Like Task.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Alpha power increases spontaneously during a neurofeedback session.Communications psychology · 2026Article
- Spontaneous Modulation of Alpha Power During a Neurofeedback Session Without Instructions.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
- Spontaneous Modulation of Standard EEG Frequency Bands During a Neurofeedback-Like Task.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
- Non-specific increase in alpha power during a neurofeedback session targeting its downregulation.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Widely used to treat cognitive, affective, psychiatric, and neurological disorders, electroencephalographic neurofeedback (EEG-NF) provides individuals with real-time feedback of their EEG activity to modify brain function. However, the mechanisms behind the EEG changes targeted by EEG-NF remain unclear. The present study addresses this gap by examining methodological issues in the assessment of spontaneous EEG changes during EEG-NF sessions. Over multiple trials, healthy young adults observed a gray circle that either remained constant (control condition) or was continuously modified in size at different frequency rates (1, 5, and 10 Hz). We investigated whether EEG frequency bands classically targeted by EEG-NF: (i) change spontaneously over time, (ii) are influenced by a continuously modified visual stimulus, and (iii) the frequency at which this stimulus is modified. Results revealed: (i) a spontaneous increase in alpha power throughout the entire task, (ii) an increase in theta power when exposing participants to a continuous modification of the visual stimulus (relative to perceiving the same unmodified stimulus), and (iii) an absence of changes in the EEG frequency bands studied when manipulating the frequency of stimulus modification. These findings suggest that the EEG changes observed during EEG-NF are influenced by the task environment itself and not only by successful EEG self-modulation. It is therefore crucial to carefully design EEG-NF protocols to account for non-specific effects and ensure that observed EEG changes are due to the hypothesized mechanisms. Further research is needed to delineate the mechanisms underlying EEG modulation in EEG-NF and to refine protocols prior to clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.