Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41046199›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2026

Non-Invasive Pancreas Ablation Using Histotripsy: Pre-clinical Safety Study in an In Vivo Porcine Model.

Jessica Gannon, Tamalika Paul, Khan Mohammad Imran, Michael Edwards, Timothy Ziemlewicz, Brie Trusiano, Tyler Moore, Cora Youngs, Manali Powar, Amber Keith and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Jessica GannonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering & Mechanics, VA Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Tamalika PaulGraduate Program in Translational Biology, Medicine & Health, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, VA, USA; Department of Biomedical Sciences & Pathobiology, Virginia-MD College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Khan Mohammad ImranGraduate Program in Translational Biology, Medicine & Health, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, VA, USA; Department of Biomedical Sciences & Pathobiology, Virginia-MD College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Michael EdwardsDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Timothy ZiemlewiczDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Brie TrusianoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences & Pathobiology, Virginia-MD College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Tyler MooreDepartment of Biomedical Sciences & Pathobiology, Virginia-MD College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Cora YoungsDepartment of Biomedical Sciences & Pathobiology, Virginia-MD College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Manali PowarFralin Biomedical Research Institute, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, VA, USA.
Amber KeithDepartment of Biological Sciences, VA Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA; School of Neuroscience, VA Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Victor LopezDepartment of Biomedical Engineering & Mechanics, VA Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Hannah IvesterDepartment of Biomedical Sciences & Pathobiology, Virginia-MD College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Lauren RugerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering & Mechanics, VA Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Sherrie ClarkDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Sheryl Coutermarsh-OttDepartment of Biomedical Sciences & Pathobiology, Virginia-MD College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Kristin EdenDepartment of Basic Science Education, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, USA.
Joan Vidal-JoveInterventional Oncology Institute Khuab, Comprehensive Tumor Center, Barcelona, Spain.
Justin GrumbirHistoSonics Inc., Plymouth, MN, USA.
Ellie JohnsenHistoSonics Inc., Plymouth, MN, USA.
Paul LaesekeDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Joe AmaralHistoSonics Inc., Plymouth, MN, USA.
Joshua StopekHistoSonics Inc., Plymouth, MN, USA.
Irving C AllenGraduate Program in Translational Biology, Medicine & Health, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, VA, USA; Department of Biomedical Sciences & Pathobiology, Virginia-MD College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA; Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Eli VlaisavljevichDepartment of Biomedical Engineering & Mechanics, VA Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA; Graduate Program in Translational Biology, Medicine & Health, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, VA, USA. Electronic address: EliV@vt.edu.

Funding

Deploying Histotripsy Based Tumor Ablation Strategies to Treat Pancreatic CancerR01CA269811 · NCI · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI Irving C Allen · 2022 to 2026
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA269811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive disease that is typically diagnosed late, leading to poor prognosis and overall survival. Even with advances in treatment, the 5-year survival rate for patients is only 12.5%. Histotripsy is a non-invasive, non-thermal and non-ionizing focused ultrasound treatment method that has recently been US FDA approved for treating liver tumors and is currently being investigated for other applications. This study expands on prior work investigating the feasibility of pancreas ablation using ultrasound-guided histotripsy in pigs. Here, we applied histotripsy to healthy pancreas in nine pigs using a therapy system with treatments guided by real-time ultrasound imaging. After treatment, subjects survived for 1 week (n = 3) or 5 weeks (n = 6). Damage to the pancreas and surrounding tissue was characterized using gross morphology, histological analysis, and computed tomography imaging. Treatment zones were visible on immediate post-procedure computed tomography, with lesion dimensions measuring 1.4 ± 0.6 cm, 1.2 ± 0.3 cm, and 1.5 ± 0.4 cm in the anteroposterior, transverse, and craniocaudal planes, aligning with the planned 1.5 cm-diameter spherical treatment volume. At 5 weeks, lesion size reduction was observed in three subjects, decreasing by 49%, 98%, and 100%, respectively. Histotripsy was well-tolerated, with successful pancreas targeting in six of nine subjects. Two cases of potential pancreatitis were noted. Three pigs experienced bowel damage due to poor ultrasound visualization, leading to off-target effects including septic peritonitis and gastrointestinal blockage. These findings suggest histotripsy is a viable approach for pancreatic treatment when the organ is clearly visualized and bubble clouds remain within the tissue.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationPancreasUltrasonography, InterventionalAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFeasibility StudiesFemaleSwineCancerHistotripsyPancreasPigsSafety

Identifiers

PMID41046199
PMCPMC12917764

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.