Trial reportAmerican heart journal2026
Effect of opt-in versus opt-out framing on trial recruitment: a study within a trial of the GAMEPAD randomized trial.
Trial report in American heart journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Messaging Informed by Behavioral Economics and Representativeness in Clinical Research Enrollment: Four Randomized Clinical Trials.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Bile Acid-Mediated Hepatic-Cardiac Axis in Fontan Chronotropy.Pediatric cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Directly contacting eligible participants with an offer to join a randomized clinical trial (RCT) is an efficient recruitment method, but the effect of different outreach strategies on enrollment fraction and completion of the trial protocol is uncertain. In a study within a trial (SWAT) of an RCT testing a physical activity intervention in patients with peripheral artery disease, eligible patients were randomized to receive an email with an invitation to join the study and a link to the trial's online platform ("opt-in") or to receive an email framing participation as part of the standard of care followed by telephone outreach from a study coordinator ("opt-out"). Among 5176 participants contacted by unsolicited email (3909 opt-in, 1267 opt-out), enrollment fraction was 1.0% in the opt-in arm (n = 39) versus 3.6% in the opt-out arm (n = 45) (OR 3.65, 95% CI 2.37-5.64); there were no significant differences between opt-in and opt-out participants in the rate of completion of trial protocol steps. This SWAT of recruitment strategies demonstrates the potential for opt-out framing and active outreach to increase enrollment fraction without compromising protocol completion in direct-to-participant RCTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.