ArticleBiology of sport2025
Physiological, perceived, and physical demands of recreational 3 × 3 basketball and high-intensity interval training in sedentary adult women.
Article in Biology of sport, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Warming Up for Basketball: Comparing Traditional vs. Small-Sided Game Approaches in Youth Players.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Sport-specific experience modulates perceived exertion but not enjoyment or workload in recreational 3 × 3 basketball.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this investigation was to compare the acute physiological responses - percentage of maximal peak heart rate (%HRpeak) and blood lactate (BLa) - as well as perceived demands (rating of perceived exertion, RPE) and enjoyment of a recreational 3 × 3 basketball match and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in sedentary women. Twelve healthy, adult sedentary women (age: 37 ± 14 years; body mass: 66 ± 19 kg; stature: 162 ± 13 cm; fat mass: 27.5 ± 12.5%) performed a 3 × 3 basketball match and HIIT including gym-based activities with comparable duration. The %HRpeak was continuously monitored during, the BLa was assessed before and after, and the RPE and enjoyment were collected at the end of each protocol. 3 × 3 basketball elicited higher %HRpeak (p < 0.001; d = -1.64, large). BLa analysis demonstrated a significant difference for all the between- and within-condition comparisons (p < 0.05; r-values: large) except for the comparison between pre-HIIT and pre-3 × 3 basketball match (p > 0.05; r-value: 0.052, no effect) and between post-HIIT and post-3 × 3 basketball match (p = 0.072; r-value: 0.495, medium). Similar low RPE (4 ±1 AU; p = 0.999; r-value = < 0.001, no effect) and high enjoyment (3 × 3 basketball = 6 ± 1 AU; HIIT = 5AU ± 1 AU, p = 0.233; r-value = 0.250, small) values were found between conditions. 3 × 3 basketball induced overall higher %HRpeak compared to HIIT, suggesting its suitability as a health-enhancing activity for sedentary adult women. Moreover, since both conditions highlighted low RPE and high enjoyment values, they have the potential to be effective in enhancing the training adherence in sedentary adult women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.