ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Imaging myocardial scar in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: advances in CMR and CT.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Survival Modeling With Echocardiographic Myocardial Texture Radiomics for Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Article
- Non-invasive Evaluation of Myocardial Fibrosis Using T1 and T2 Mapping by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Cureus · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocardial scarring is a hallmark of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and a major driver of adverse outcomes, including sudden cardiac death and heart failure progression. The fibrotic substrate in HCM is complex, encompassing both replacement and interstitial fibrosis, often accompanied by myocardial disarray. Advanced cardiovascular imaging enables detailed scar characterization, which is crucial for risk stratification and personalized management. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold standard for non-invasive fibrosis assessment. Techniques such as late gadolinium enhancement, myocardial mapping of T1 and T2 relaxation properties, and diffusion tensor imaging provide complementary insights into scar burden and architecture. Cardiac computed tomography (CT) is an emerging modality with increasing clinical relevance. Delayed iodine enhancement and CT-derived extracellular volume mapping offer a valuable alternative for scar assessment, particularly when CMR is contraindicated. This review highlights the role of multimodality imaging in assessing myocardial scar in HCM, with a focus on CMR and CT, and explores their clinical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.