ReviewRSC advances2025
Valorization of citrus processing waste into high-performance bionanomaterials: green synthesis, biomedicine, and environmental remediation.
Review in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sustainably Synthesized CeOMicromachines · 2026Article
- Green Recovery of Bioactive Compounds from Bergamot (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Utilization of Biomass Waste from Citrus Fruits for the Production of Essential Oils.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Sustainable synthesis of bimetallic Cu-Ag nanoparticles using waste-derived chitosan and citrus extract: a green approach to combat antimicrobial resistance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cascade Valorisation of Lemon Processing Residues (Part II): Integrated Biorefinery Design, Circular Economy, and Techno-Economic Feasibility.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cascade Valorisation of Lemon-Processing Residues (Part I): Current Trends in Green Extraction Technologies and High-Value Bioactive Recovery.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global citrus industry generates millions of tons of citrus processing waste (CPW), composed primarily of peel, pulp, and seeds. This agro-industrial byproduct represents both an environmental challenge and a valuable feedstock for sustainable nanotechnology. This review explores green synthesis approaches for transforming CPW, rich in bioactive compounds such as flavonoids, essential oils, and pectin, into high-performance bionanomaterials. Emphasis is placed on their biomedical applications, including antimicrobial formulations, wound healing agents, and nanocarriers for drug delivery, as well as their use in environmental remediation and catalysis. In contrast to earlier reviews, this work highlights recent progress in eco-friendly synthesis techniques (
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.