ArticleInternational journal of medical sciences2025
Exploring the relationship between exercise and diabetes risk in a prediabetes population.
Article in International journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global incidence of prediabetes is on the rise, with an estimated 5 to 10% of individuals expected to transition to diabetes. We investigated factors associated with the progression of prediabetes to diabetes. Our primary data source was the Taiwan Biobank (TWB). The main outcome was the development of diabetes during the follow-up period among individuals who were initially diagnosed with prediabetes. We included 4,958 participants from the TWB, who were divided into four groups based on their levels of exercise. The exercise status of participants was assessed based on questionnaire responses collected during the enrollment and follow-up phases. Participants were categorized into one of the following groups: no exercise, transition from no exercise to exercise, transition from exercise to no exercise, and regular exercise. We used multiple logistic regression to establish the analysis model, which comprised 2,891 women and 2,067 men. The exercise group, comprising individuals who consistently engaged in exercise both at enrollment and during the follow-up period, exhibited a lower risk of developing diabetes (odds ratio [OR] = 0.755; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.640-0.892) compared to the no exercise group. When stratified by gender, the exercise group remained significantly associated with a reduced risk of diabetes in both women (OR = 0.752, 95% CI = 0.602-0.940) and men (OR = 0.762, 95% CI = 0.591-0.982)
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.