ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Multimodal prognostic models for bladder urothelial carcinoma: uroplakin III combined with serum and demographic data.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cell-free RNA profiling uncovers non-canonical circulating D2 transcript elevation in Bladder Cancer plasma.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bladder urothelial carcinoma (BUC) remains a highly recurrent and heterogeneous malignancy. Accurate postoperative risk stratification is crucial to guide adjuvant therapy decisions. We hypothesized that integrating Uroplakin III (UPK3A protein)protein expression with systemic inflammation markers and demographic factors could improve prognostic prediction through advanced machine learning(ML) models. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 1,032 BUC patients who underwent radical cystectomy. Clinical, pathological, and serological data, including immunohistochemical UPK3A protein expression, were collected. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression with λ=0.009 (determined via 10-fold cross-validation) was used for feature selection. Nine ML models were trained and validated. Model performance was assessed using Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC), calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and clinical impact curves (CIC). Model interpretability was evaluated with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results: Light Gradient Boosting Machine(LightGBM), Random Forest(RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models demonstrated superior performance (AUCs: 0.894/0.754 for RF in training/test sets). SHAP analysis highlighted vascular invasion, tumor necrosis, and UPK3A protein as key predictors. CIC demonstrated strong clinical utility. Integrating UPK3A protein with inflammatory and demographic variables outperformed traditional models. Conclusions: The combination of UPK3A protein expression with multimodal features significantly enhances prognostic modeling in BUC. This approach offers a promising clinical decision support tool to stratify risk and guide postoperative management. Future studies should incorporate transcriptomic/proteomic data to further validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.