Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050118›Full record

ArticleKidney medicine2025

Avacopan in Double-Positive Vasculitis...Why Not Consider It?: A Case Report.

Shehab Sayed, Patricia Torres, Patricia Purón, Marina Alonso, Eduardo Gutierrez, Ángel M Sevillano, Enrique Morales

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shehab SayedDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Patricia TorresDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Patricia PurónDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Marina AlonsoDepartment of Pathological Anatomy, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Eduardo GutierrezDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Ángel M SevillanoDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Enrique MoralesDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN) secondary to antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis and antiglomerular basement membrane disease has a poor prognosis, influenced by the dual positivity of both antibodies. Despite the use of aggressive immunosuppressive treatments, the outlook remains bleak, with a high percentage of patients progressing to advanced chronic kidney disease or requiring renal replacement therapy. We present the case of a 72-year-old patient with RPGN associated with vasculitis and double positivity, confirmed by immunological testing and renal histology. The patient was initially treated with a combination of glucocorticoid pulses, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and plasmapheresis. Shortly thereafter, however, she experienced a relapse, which led to the addition of avacopan to the treatment regimen, with progressive improvement in clinical status and kidney function. This case highlights the importance of considering aggressive therapeutic strategies in antiglomerular basement membrane disease, including avacopan as part of immunosuppressive therapy to prevent progression to advanced chronic kidney disease.

Indexed as

ANCA-associated vasculitisanti-GBM diseaseavacopancase reportdouble-positive vasculitis

Identifiers

PMID41050118
PMCPMC12495152

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.