Evidence mapPaperPMID 41050409Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Comparative gastrointestinal adverse effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists and multi-target analogs in type 2 diabetes: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Xingmiao Xie, Shuiyuan Yang, Shuzhen Deng, Yuying Liu, Zhibin Xu, Binghong He

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Modern Management of CKM Syndrome: Use of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in a Multidisciplinary Setting-Expert Group Recommendations from Kuwait.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xingmiao XieDepartment of Pharmacy, Guangzhou Panyu District Eighth People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Shuiyuan YangDepartment of Pharmacy, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Shuzhen DengDepartment of Pharmacy, Guangzhou Panyu District Eighth People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Yuying LiuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Guangzhou Panyu District Eighth People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Zhibin Xu *Medical College, Shantou University, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Binghong HeDepartment of Pharmacy, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate and compare the gastrointestinal adverse effects associated with different GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and multi-target analogs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the gastrointestinal adverse events of GLP-1RAs in T2DM patients. Inclusion criteria included adult patients with confirmed T2DM receiving any GLP-1RA, with the outcomes focused on gastrointestinal adverse events such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, dyspepsia, and reduced appetite. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the comparison of gastrointestinal side effects among different GLP-1RAs. Results: A total of 48 RCTs involving 27,729 participants were included in the analysis. The overall incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events was 11.66%, with nausea being the most frequent (21.49%) and reduced appetite the least frequent (5.49%). Tirzepatide had the highest risk of inducing nausea and diarrhea, while dulaglutide and lixisenatide had the lowest risks. Exenatide exhibited the highest incidence of vomiting, while dulaglutide showed a lower risk. Semaglutide demonstrated a significantly higher risk of diarrhea compared to other GLP-1RAs. Conclusion: This study highlights significant differences in the gastrointestinal adverse event profiles of various GLP-1RAs. Tirzepatide exhibited the highest risk of gastrointestinal side effects, whereas dulaglutide and exenatide showed relatively better tolerability. These findings provide valuable insights for clinicians to make informed treatment decisions, emphasizing the importance of individualized therapy based on patient tolerance. Systematic Review Registration: CRD42024592308.

Indexed as

Bayesian network meta-analysisdiarrheagastrointestinal adverse eventsGLP-1 receptor agonistsnauseatype 2 diabetes mellitusvomiting

Identifiers

PMID41050409
PMCPMC12491879

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.