ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025
Coronary vasodilator capacity in obesity and morbid obesity - divergent flow responses with left ventricular hypertrophy.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decoding the coronary paradox of obesity: not all fat is equal!International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To investigate the relationship between coronary vasodilator capacity, left ventricular hypertrophy, and regional myocardial function in two different disease entities of obese (OB) and morbidly obese (MOB) individuals. Methods: Results: MFR progressively decreased from NW, OW, to OB (2.71 ± 0.84 vs. 2.50 ± 0.67 and 2.33 ± 0.63; p ≤ 0.04 by ANOVA), while it increased again in MOB comparable to NW (2.51 ± 0.51 vs. 2.71 ± 0.84, p = 0.70). In OB and MOB, MFR was inversely correlated with E velocity (cm/s), respectively (r = 0.32, SEE = 0.58, p = 0.02; and r = 0.29, SEE = 0.47, p = 0.02). Conversely, LVM, and GLS associated significantly and inversely with the MFR in OB (r = 0.27, SEE = 0.59, p = 0.05; and r = 0.31, SEE = 0.61, p = 0.04), but not in MOB, respectively (r = 0.13, SEE = 0.49, p = 0.27; and r = 0.05, SEE = 0.54, p = 0.73). Notably, GLS, E-velocity, and LVM remained independent predictors of MFR. Conclusion: Divergent associations of coronary vasodilator capacity with left ventricular mass and early myocardial contractile dysfunction outline OB and MOB to affect left ventricular remodeling differently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.