ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2025
A REDCap advanced randomization module to meet the needs of modern trials.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects and User-Reported Experiences of a Self-Management Mobile Health App for Grieving Adolescents: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
- A Stepped Care, Peer-Delivered Intervention to Improve Substance Use and HIV Medication Adherence in Primary Care in South Africa (ProjectJMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSince 2012, the electronic data capture platform REDCap has included an embedded randomization module allowing a single randomization per study record with the ability to stratify by variables such as study site and participant sex at birth. In recent years, platform, adaptive, decentralized, and pragmatic trials have gained popularity. These trial designs often require approaches to randomization not supported by the original REDCap randomization module, including randomizing patients into multiple domains or at multiple points in time, changing allocation tables to add or drop study groups, or adaptively changing allocation ratios based on data from previously enrolled participants. Our team aimed to develop new randomization functions to address these issues.
methodsA collaborative process facilitated by the NIH-funded Trial Innovation Network was initiated to modernize the randomization module in REDCap, incorporating feedback from clinical trialists, biostatisticians, technologists, and other experts.
resultsThis effort led to the development of an advanced randomization module within the REDCap platform. In addition to supporting platform, adaptive, decentralized, and pragmatic trials, the new module introduces several new features, such as improved support for blinded randomization, additional randomization metadata capture (e.g., user identity and timestamp), additional tools allowing REDCap administrators to support investigators using the randomization module, and the ability for clinicians participating in pragmatic or decentralized trials to perform randomization through a survey without needing log-in access to the study database. As of June 19, 2025, multiple randomizations have been used in 211 projects from 55 institutions, randomizations with real-time trigger logic in 108 projects from 64 institutions, and blinded group allocation in 24 projects from 17 institutions.
conclusionThe new randomization module aims to streamline the randomization process, improve trial efficiency, and ensure robust data integrity, thereby supporting the conduct of more sophisticated and adaptive clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.