ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
Cancer detection via one-shot learning: integrating gene expression and genomic mutation analysis.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing Omics Analyses Through Coalitional Games and Shapley Values.Methods and protocols · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCancer is a complex disease influenced by numerous concurrent genetic factors that result in diverse tumor microenvironments (TMEs) across different cancer types. Large-scale genomic projects, such as The Cancer Genome Atlas, have underscored the need for molecular classification of cancer to enable more precise therapeutic strategies. Yet, traditional machine learning (ML) approaches currently face several limitations. First, while effective, they predominantly rely on gene expression data and often overlook critical genomic alterations such as copy number alterations, single nucleotide polymorphisms, and other mutational profiles, limiting the scope of biomarker discovery. Most importantly, they are usually limited by the need of large sample sizes.
resultsBuilding on the hypothesis that type-agnostic representations integrating gene expression with genomic mutations can comprehensively characterize TMEs and capture the similarity or dissimilarity between samples of the same or different types, we propose a novel ML-based method for cancer detection using a one-shot learning framework implemented through Siamese Neural Networks. Our method redefines cancer detection as a similarity-based classification task, allowing the model to generalize to unseen cancer types, a critical advantage in genomics where data scarcity and frequent updates pose significant challenges. To enhance interpretability, we introduce a robust explainability technique founded on SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values, to provide clear insights into the contributions of gene expression and mutational data, enabling a deeper understanding of the key factors driving cancer detection decisions.
conclusionsOur experimental results show that integrating mutational profiles with gene expression data allows for more accurate cancer type detection and reveals significant mutation patterns. These findings indicate that the proposed method has the potential to significantly enhance cancer type detection by leveraging a more comprehensive understanding of TMEs. Beyond merely classifying cancer types, the proposed SHAP-based explainability technique enables the identification and the analysis of key biomarkers relevant for immunotherapy success, thereby addressing limitations of existing approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.