Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41056992›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2025

Bounding phenotype transition probabilities via conditional complexity.

Kamal Dingle, Pascal Hagolani, Roland Zimm, Muhammad Umar, Samantha O'Sullivan, Ard Louis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kamal DingleGulf University for Science and Technology, Hawally, Hawalli Governorate, Kuwait.ORCID 0000-0003-4423-3255
Pascal HagolaniGulf University for Science and Technology, Hawally, Hawalli Governorate, Kuwait.
Roland ZimmEcole Normale Superieure de Lyon, Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France.
Muhammad UmarGulf University for Science and Technology, Hawally, Hawalli Governorate, Kuwait.
Samantha O'SullivanUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1171-815X
Ard LouisUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Gulf University for Science and Technology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By linking genetic sequences to phenotypic traits, genotype-phenotype maps represent a key layer in biological organization. Their structure modulates the effects of genetic mutations which can contribute to shaping evolutionary outcomes. Recent work based on algorithmic information theory introduced an upper bound on the likelihood of a random genetic mutation causing a transition between two phenotypes, using only the conditional complexity between them. Here we evaluate how well this bound works for a range of genotype-phenotype maps, including a differential equation model for circadian rhythm, a matrix-multiplication model of gene regulatory networks, a developmental model of tooth morphologies for ringed seals, a polyomino-tile shape model of biological self-assembly, and the hydrophobic/polar (HP) lattice protein model. By assessing three levels of predictive performance, we find that the bound provides meaningful estimates of phenotype transition probabilities across these complex systems. These results suggest that transition probabilities can be predicted to some degree directly from the phenotypes themselves, without needing detailed knowledge of the underlying genotype-phenotype map.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksModels, GeneticPhenotypeAnimalsCircadian RhythmGenotypeMutationToothalgorithmic probabilitybiological evolutiongenotype–phenotype mapsKolmogorov complexitypredictionsimplicity bias

Identifiers

PMID41056992
PMCPMC12503940

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.