ArticleGene therapy2025
Codon changes challenge PCR-based gene doping detection.
Article in Gene therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards a Comprehensive Screening Approach for Detecting Gene Doping in Racehorses and Sport Horses by Targeting Common and Intrinsic Plasmid Sequences.Drug testing and analysis · 2026Article
- LC-HRMS detection of three ionizable lipids in equine plasma: surrogate markers for long-term LNP-mediated gene-doping surveillance.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic/genomic manipulation techniques (gene transfer/delivery, gene editing, etc.) have become more and more mature, and the illegal use as gene doping in sports has drawn attentions. World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) strictly prohibits gene doping, and has issued guideline on quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) detections. However, the technical feature of qPCR makes it difficult to detect new doping targets, and codon changes on targets may also affect detection efficiency. Here, we prepare standard materials for genomic and transgenic versions of human EPO (hEPO) gene, and design qPCR primers to check the consequences of codon changes on gene doping detection. We confirm that carefully designed qPCR assays could indeed capture transgene signal, but codon changes on the transgene could severely undermine detection efficiency. We have also mimicked real world gene doping scenario by mixing genomic and transgenic versions of hEPO, and qPCR could detect wild-type but not codon-changed transgenes. As a method validation for such a challenge, we also use Sanger sequencing to confirm that sequencing could easily capture gene doping even for codon-changed transgenes. Our study confirms that codon changes will challenge qPCR-based gene doping detection, and calls for un-biased detection tools based on high-throughput sequencing in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41057515What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.