ArticleRadiology advances2024
Explainable AI to identify radiographic features of pulmonary edema.
Article in Radiology advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Radiological assessment of pulmonary vascularity in congenital heart disease: standardized clinician assessment versus deep learning-based prediction.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary edema is a leading cause for requiring hospitalization in patients with congestive heart failure. Assessing the severity of this condition with radiological imaging becomes paramount in determining the optimal course of patient care. Purpose: This study aimed to develop a deep learning methodology for the identification of radiographic features associated with pulmonary edema. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study used a dataset from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care database comprising 1000 chest radiograph images from 741 patients with suspected pulmonary edema. The images were annotated by an experienced radiologist, who labeled radiographic manifestations of cephalization, Kerley lines, pleural effusion, bat wings, and infiltrate features of edema. The proposed methodology involves 2 consecutive stages: lung segmentation and edema feature localization. The segmentation stage is implemented using an ensemble of 3 networks. In the subsequent localization stage, we evaluated 8 object detection networks, assessing their performance with average precision (AP) and mean AP. Results: Effusion, infiltrate, and bat wing features were best detected by the Side-Aware Boundary Localization (SABL) network with corresponding APs of 0.599, 0.395, and 0.926, respectively. Furthermore, SABL achieved the highest overall mean AP of 0.568. The Cascade Region Proposal Network network attained the highest AP of 0.417 for Kerley lines and the Probabilistic Anchor Assignment network achieved the highest AP of 0.533 for cephalization. Conclusion: The proposed methodology, with the application of SABL, Cascade Region Proposal Network, and Probabilistic Anchor Assignment detection networks, is accurate and efficient in localizing and identifying pulmonary edema features and is therefore a promising diagnostic candidate for interpretable severity assessment of pulmonary edema.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.