ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
An analysis of the 6-h ultra-marathon race using a machine learning approach.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ultra-marathon running popularity is increasing, with the 6-h run being the shortest time-limited ultra-marathon. Since very little is known regarding the country from which the fastest 6-h runners originate, the fastest age group, and where the fastest 6-h race courses are located, this study aims to close this gap. Methods: A machine learning model based on the XG Boost algorithm was built to predict running speed based on the athletés age, gender, country of origin, and the country where the race takes place. Model explainability tools were used to investigate how each independent variable would influence the predicted running speed. To assess the impact of individual performance against the other variables under study, a Mixed Effects Linear Model was also built. Results: A total of 117,882 race records from 51,018 unique runners from 65 countries participating in races held in 56 different countries were analyzed. Participation is spread across a wide range of countries, with a high correlation between the country of origin and the country of the event. Most runners originated from Germany, Italy, France, the USA, and Sweden, with Europe (Belgium, Russia, Spain, Poland, Romania, and Lithuania), being the fastest. Most athletes competed in Italy, Germany, France, the USA, and The Netherlands. The fastest average running speeds were also achieved in European countries (Russia, Belgium, Poland, Netherlands, Romania, Croatia, and Lithuania). Conclusions: For athletes competing in a 6-h ultramarathon, gender was the most important predictor, followed by the origin of the athlete, the age, and the race location. The 6-h running event seems to be dominated by European athletes regarding both participation and performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.