Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41062709›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2025

An update on mechanisms and treatment options for priapism.

Karl H Pang, Hussain M Alnajjar, Alexander Lal, Asif Muneer

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karl H PangDepartment of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5703-2319
Hussain M AlnajjarDepartment of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6364-0310
Alexander LalUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Asif MuneerDepartment of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. asif.muneer@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2958-1614

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Priapism is an abnormal prolonged penile erection that persists in the absence of any sexual stimulation. Priapism can be subcategorized into three types: ischaemic (low-flow or veno-occlusive), non-ischaemic (high-flow or arterial) and stuttering priapism. Ischaemic priapism is the most common subtype and is associated with multiple aetiologies, most commonly haemoglobinopathies and antipsychotic medications. The mechanisms underlying stuttering priapism are complex, and involve dysregulation of the nitric oxide signalling pathway, Rho-Rho kinase pathway, adenosine, opiorphins, oxidative stress and androgens. The investigation and management of priapism involve a stepwise approach. A clinical history, examination and a blood-gas analysis from the corpus cavernosum helps to distinguish between ischaemic and non-ischaemic subtypes. Colour Doppler ultrasonography and penile MRI can be used in more complex cases, or those with a delayed presentation. Treatment involves cavernosal blood aspiration followed by instillation of an α-adrenergic receptor agonist such as phenylephrine, proceeding to penile shunt surgery (within the first 24-48 h) if the priapism persists. Insertion of a penile prosthesis is indicated when a shunting procedure or penoscrotal decompression fails, or if a patient presents with a priapism persisting longer than 36-48 h depending on the guidelines used. For non-ischaemic priapism following failed conservative treatment, selective arterial embolization of the arteriocorporal fistula can be performed. The aetiology and pathophysiology of the different priapism subtypes help to determine the management of specific patients.

Indexed as

PriapismHumansMalePenis

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.