Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41062843›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2026

Update on the similarities between SADS, SIDS, and SUDEP: Three sides of the same pyramid?

Rosario Barranco, Isabella Caristo, Andrea Molinelli, Gabriele Rocca, Nicolò Vernazza, Francesco Ventura

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rosario BarrancoDepartment of Legal and Forensic Medicine, Health Science Department (DISSAL), University of Genova, via De Toni 12, Genova, 16132, Italy. rosario.barranco@libero.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2838-7716
Isabella CaristoDepartment of Legal and Forensic Medicine, Health Science Department (DISSAL), University of Genova, via De Toni 12, Genova, 16132, Italy.
Andrea MolinelliDepartment of Legal and Forensic Medicine, Health Science Department (DISSAL), University of Genova, via De Toni 12, Genova, 16132, Italy.
Gabriele RoccaDepartment of Legal and Forensic Medicine, Health Science Department (DISSAL), University of Genova, via De Toni 12, Genova, 16132, Italy.
Nicolò VernazzaDepartment of Legal and Forensic Medicine, Health Science Department (DISSAL), University of Genova, via De Toni 12, Genova, 16132, Italy.
Francesco VenturaDepartment of Legal and Forensic Medicine, Health Science Department (DISSAL), University of Genova, via De Toni 12, Genova, 16132, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sudden Arrhythmic Death Syndrome (SADS), Sudden Unexpected Death In Epilepsy (SUDEP) and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) present some overlaps and similarities in terms of molecular autopsy and pathophysiological mechanism. Genes associated with cardiac arrhythmias represent promising biomarkers, in light of the growing evidence of neurocardiac interconnections and phenotypic similarities between SUDEP, SADS and also SIDS. The interactions between these different forms of sudden death are reciprocal and could help to understand the mechanism of death that in some cases remains unexplained. In this review of the literature we analyse the overlaps and the common aspects between these different conditions of sudden death, we discuss the clinical, social and medico-legal implications. SIDS, SADS and SUDEP still represent a huge challenge for the Forensic Pathologist and their diagnostic interpretation contains some ambiguities and evaluation difficulties. All cases of sudden death require a thorough cardio-pathological and neuropathological evaluation. A thorough anamnesis and molecular analysis of the major channel protein genes (such as SCN5A, RYR2, KCHN2, and KCNQ1) should be performed in these cases, in addition to histological and toxicological analyses. Only a thorough and multidisciplinary evaluation can help to better define the cases of sudden death, avoid improper classifications and clarify the pathological mechanism more precisely.

Indexed as

Arrhythmias, CardiacDeath, SuddenSudden Infant DeathSudden Unexpected Death in EpilepsyHumansInfantForensic pathologyMolecular autopsyPathophysiological overlapsSADSSIDSSUDEP

Identifiers

PMID41062843
PMCPMC12808204

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.