ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Update on the similarities between SADS, SIDS, and SUDEP: Three sides of the same pyramid?
Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid hippocampal kindling of mice as a model of sudden unexpected death in temporal lobe epilepsy.Experimental neurology · 2026Article
- Molecular mechanisms of sudden unexplained death and recent updates on molecular autopsy strategies for forensic investigation.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Review
- Hidden and Under-Recognized Causes of Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy (SUDI): A Comprehensive Review of Autopsy Findings.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sudden Arrhythmic Death Syndrome (SADS), Sudden Unexpected Death In Epilepsy (SUDEP) and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) present some overlaps and similarities in terms of molecular autopsy and pathophysiological mechanism. Genes associated with cardiac arrhythmias represent promising biomarkers, in light of the growing evidence of neurocardiac interconnections and phenotypic similarities between SUDEP, SADS and also SIDS. The interactions between these different forms of sudden death are reciprocal and could help to understand the mechanism of death that in some cases remains unexplained. In this review of the literature we analyse the overlaps and the common aspects between these different conditions of sudden death, we discuss the clinical, social and medico-legal implications. SIDS, SADS and SUDEP still represent a huge challenge for the Forensic Pathologist and their diagnostic interpretation contains some ambiguities and evaluation difficulties. All cases of sudden death require a thorough cardio-pathological and neuropathological evaluation. A thorough anamnesis and molecular analysis of the major channel protein genes (such as SCN5A, RYR2, KCHN2, and KCNQ1) should be performed in these cases, in addition to histological and toxicological analyses. Only a thorough and multidisciplinary evaluation can help to better define the cases of sudden death, avoid improper classifications and clarify the pathological mechanism more precisely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.