Evidence mapPaperPMID 41064113Full record

ArticleHIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Determining the Feasibility of a Mail-In Saliva Sample Protocol for Persons Living with HIV in Two Urban Northeast United States Clinics.

Matthew D Mara, Cynthia Miguel, Nina H Lin, Curt G Beckwith, Michelle Henshaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew D MaraGeneral Dentistry, Boston University Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6376-6394
Cynthia MiguelSocial Determinants of Health Analytics, Highmark Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Nina H LinDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4913-0442
Curt G BeckwithDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8430-8111
Michelle HenshawOffice of Global and Population Health, Boston, Massachusetts, University Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2586-8466

Funding

Providence/Boston Center for AIDS Research (CFAR)P30AI042853 · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · 1998 to 2025
$9.6M
Testing and Texting in Community Health Center Dental Clinics to Diagnose and Prevent HIV InfectionUH3DE031249 · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · 2025 to 2025
$722k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI042853NIDCR NIH HHS UH3 DE031249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mail-in saliva samples are a participant-centered means of monitoring patients' oral and overall health that may help to reduce unnecessary medical trips and more efficiently use provider time. The use and acceptability of mail-in saliva samples have been studied in high-risk populations; however, it has not been studied in cohorts of people living with HIV (PLWH). Objective: To investigate the feasibility of PLWHs' willingness to provide mail-in saliva samples, 900 saliva collection kits were mailed to a randomized sample of PLWH across two urban and diverse clinics in the Northeast United States in 2019-2020. Results: 73/900 (8%) packages were returned to study personnel, with 100% (73/73) containing saliva deemed usable for analysis. 55/900 (6%) of packages were returned to the study team undeliverable. Further information may be gained from investigating the influence of personalized test results, health literacy, the requirement of the oral health survey, and study compensation that may affect an individual's motivation to participate in the study. Conclusion: While findings suggest limited feasibility of mail-in saliva collection without personalized test results in a cohort of PLWH in terms of response rate, all returned saliva samples were usable for analysis suggesting that addressing potential barriers may improve response rates and the feasibility of using mail-in salivary diagnostics to monitor disease progression in PLWH in future studies.

Indexed as

adherence interventionsdisease monitoringremote collectionrespondent driven samplingsaliva diagnostics

Identifiers

PMID41064113
PMCPMC12500845

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.