ArticleHealth science reports2025
Deep Learning for Early Detection of Cardiovascular Diseases From Medical Imaging.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing Clinical and Biochemical Data for Personalized Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: a Machine Learning Approach Toward Precision Nutrition.The Journal of nutrition · 2026Observational
- Advancing Clinical and Ethical Dimensions of Deep Learning in Cardiovascular Imaging.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Response to the Letter to the Editor "Advancing Clinical and Ethical Dimensions of Deep Learning in Cardiovascular Imaging".Health science reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain a leading cause of mortality worldwide, making early detection vital for reducing morbidity and death rates. Echocardiography is a widely used, noninvasive imaging tool for diagnosing CVDs, but manual interpretation can be time-consuming and subject to variability. This study aims to evaluate the performance of a deep learning model using echocardiogram videos for the early detection of CVDs. Methods: We applied a convolutional neural network (CNN), based on the ResNet-50 architecture, to the EchoNet-Dynamic data set, which includes echocardiogram videos. Preprocessing involved resizing frames and applying augmentation techniques to enhance model robustness. The data set was split into training (80%) and testing (20%) subsets. The model was trained to classify patients based on the presence or absence of CVD using temporal video features. Results: The CNN model achieved strong performance metrics, with an overall accuracy of 92.3%, a precision of 91.5%, a recall of 92.7%, and an F1-score of 92.1%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) was 0.95, indicating excellent discriminatory ability. These results highlight the model's capability to detect CVDs accurately from dynamic echocardiographic imaging. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the potential of deep learning, particularly CNN-based models, for automating the early detection of CVDs using echocardiogram videos. The high performance of the model suggests it could contribute to faster, more accurate, and cost-effective diagnosis in clinical practice. Future research should focus on improving model generalizability across diverse populations and enhancing interpretability for integration into clinical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.