SynthesisFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Properties of MSC populations enriched in CD146-expressing MSCs - a systematic review and meta-analysis of
Synthesis in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cell Surface Markers of Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Current Knowledge and Advances in Characterization Technologies.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are promising therapeutic candidates in regenerative medicine and the treatment of inflammatory diseases, yet their therapeutic effectiveness is limited by their heterogeneity. Clinical outcomes may be enhanced by isolating MSC subpopulations based on surface markers, including CD146. Many in vitro studies have investigated various cellular properties of MSC subpopulations that are enriched in CD146-expressing cells (CD146 Methods: Two electronic databases were searched until 9 September 2024. Studies were screened using PICO-based eligibility criteria whilst following PRISMA guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed by evaluating reporting and methodological criteria, modified from Samuel et al. A Meta-analysis was performed on four studies on population doubling time (PDT) and five studies on colony-forming (CF) potential comparing CD146 Results: A total of 29 in vitro studies were covered by this systematic review. PDT was slightly higher in CD146 Conclusion: Overall, this systematic review indicates that CD146
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.