ArticleHeadache2026
Building a national headache medicine research network: The BE WELL with Migraine Champion Providers Network™.
Article in Headache, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveOur objective was to develop and assess the effectiveness of a national network of clinicians referring adults with migraine for a remotely delivered clinical trial.
backgroundA national practice-based research network in Headache Medicine would facilitate referrals into clinical trials. Given our unique, entirely virtual study, we established a national network of health care professionals to identify potential participants.
methodsThe BE WELL with Migraine Champion Providers Network™ began to support clinician referrals across the United States into a remotely conducted clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of a nondrug virtual group intervention. Participant trial recruitment includes community outreach and clinician referrals, then potential participants complete a multi-step eligibility process. The primary study team obtains informed consent and collects all study outcomes. Clinicians interested in referring patients register for the Network via a Research Electronic Data Capture survey. The ongoing clinical trial allows for recruitment of trial participants and network members through 2026. We analyzed Network survey results through February 25, 2025, with descriptive statistics and qualitative analyses. We compared participant progression through eligibility assessment between clinician referral and community outreach.
resultsThe BE WELL with Migraine Champion Providers Network™ includes 46 clinicians across the United States through February 2025, and most (89%) of them are headache specialists. Although many have previously served as trial principal investigator (PI) (54%) or recruited (72%) for a trial in the past, 28% are recruiting for a clinical trial for the first time. Top motivating factors for Network participation included nonpharmacological option (n = 12), research contribution (n = 11), potential for patient improvement (n = 11), and working with PI (n = 9). To date, 905 participants completed the initial online screener, with 5% (n = 41) from clinician referrals and 95% (n = 864) from community recruitment. Of those, 12.3% (n = 107) were eligible to continue and consented and completed the virtual interview. After the interview, 65 participants progressed to the headache log run-in period and then were randomized/eligible for randomization (six from referrals, 59 from community). Of the original participants from clinician referrals who completed the online screener, 14.6% (six of 41) were randomized/eligible for randomization, compared to 6.8% (59 of 864) recruited via community. Once consented, 100% (six of six) of Network-referred patients progressed to randomization/eligibility for randomization versus only 58% (59 of 101) from community recruitment.
conclusionThe BE WELL with Migraine Champion Providers Network™ models the development and implementation of a national clinician referring network that can help accomplish the field's research priorities. Although growth and implementation of a national network takes time, our results demonstrate the yield of appropriate referrals eligible for randomization was more than double community recruitment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.