ArticleTransfusion2025
Strategies to mitigate transfusion-associated red blood cell alloimmunization in sickle cell disease: A retrospective analysis.
Article in Transfusion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost analysis considerations for red blood cell matching to mitigate alloimmunization in patients with sickle cell disease.Transfusion · 2026Article
- Quantifying red blood cell compatibility beyond ABO and RhD: a recipient-centered model for matching, allocation, and inventory curation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of Rh five-antigen-matched transfusion on alloimmunization and clinical outcomes in patients requiring repeated red blood cell transfusions: a prospective randomized controlled study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe American Society of Hematology (ASH) recommends prophylactic limited red blood cell (RBC) antigen matching for C, E, and K for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). At our institution, reflexive extended antigen matching is employed: no antigen matching is undertaken initially; in the event of RBC alloimmunization, extended antigen matching (C/c, E/e, K, Fy STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsWe compared alloimmunization rates and costs of reflexive extended antigen matching with other RBC antigen-matching strategies. A 5-year retrospective review was conducted of all patients with SCD, who were transfused during the study period and lacked prior immunization. Age, sex, ABO/Rh type, number of transfused units of RBCs, antibody history, and transfusion reactions were assessed. The alloimmunization rate was defined as the number of new alloantibodies per 100 units of transfused RBCs. Costs were estimated for reflexive extended antigen matching, limited antigen matching, and extended antigen matching.
resultsOf 805 patients, 325 (40.4%) met inclusion criteria. Fifty (50/325, 15.4%) patients developed a positive antibody-detection test after transfusing a median of 9 (interquartile range: 3-14) units (alloimmunization rate 0.29 per 100 RBCs); anti-C, E, and K were leading alloantibodies. Seven (7/50, 14.0%) responders developed additional antibodies. Two delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions (DHTRs) were reported. Reflexive extended antigen-matching cost $4,619,133 over the 5-year period; projected costs of prophylactic limited and extended antigen matching were $9,578,253 (+107%) and $14,537,373 (+215%), respectively. DISCUSSION: Acknowledging the limitation of excluding some responders, the rates of alloimmunization and DHTRs, and comparatively low costs suggest that reflexive extended antigen matching is viable for selected settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.