ArticleThe ISME journal2025
Co-cultivation rescues suicidal Paenibacillus amylolyticus swarms.
Article in The ISME journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bacterial locomotion is integral to acquiring resources and getting access to new niches. Swarming, a type of motility where flagellated bacteria cooperatively move together across a semi-solid surface, is one example of how bacteria can colonize new territories. This collective behavior is temporally and spatially orchestrated, requiring task specialization of community members. In this study, we paired a swarming bacterium, Paenibacillus amylolyticus, with a non-swarmer, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, to investigate the impact on fitness of each strain. In dual-species conditions, the community swarm became significantly thicker and improved the ability of S. maltophilia to range into new territories. Swarming enabled P. amylolyticus to cross barriers of antimicrobials, whereas the thicker, dual-species swarm did not empower S. maltophilia to cross. Comparative studies of population dynamics revealed that over time, monospecies swarms of P. amylolyticus entered a state unable to grow despite still showing reductase activity. However, in a dual-species swarm, S. maltophilia rescued P. amylolyticus from this state. This rescue is attributed to the pH stabilization that occurs in this two-species combination, where S. maltophilia alkalizes the environment, thereby providing a more favorable environment for P. amylolyticus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.