Evidence mapPaperPMID 41066010Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2025

Cardiovascular Risk Associated with Menopause and Menopause Hormone Therapy: A Review and Contemporary Approach to Risk Assessment.

Zoee D'Costa, Emily Spertus, Shipra Hingorany, Rajita Patil, Tamara Horwich, Marcella Calfon Press, Janki Shah, Karol E Watson, Lua Jafari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Then and Now: What We Have Learned From the WHI.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zoee D'CostaDavid Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. zdcosta@mednet.ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0166-3254
Emily SpertusUniversity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Shipra HingoranyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Rajita PatilDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Tamara HorwichDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Marcella Calfon PressDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Janki ShahDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Karol E WatsonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Lua JafariDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewDiscuss the effects of menopause and menopause hormone therapy (MHT) on cardiovascular risk, and propose a structured, person-centered framework for cardiovascular risk assessment when initiating MHT. RECENT

findingsThe risk of atherosclerotic heart disease accelerates during the menopause transition due to hormonal, metabolic, and vascular changes. Both menopause and MHT affect cardiovascular risk factors (i.e. blood pressure, lipids, insulin resistance) and cardiovascular events (i.e. myocardial infarction and stroke). Early clinical trial evidence demonstrated that oral synthetic MHT, including conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), is associated with increased coronary heart disease and stroke risk, particularly in older, postmenopausal women. Contemporary formulations such as low-dose transdermal estrogen and micronized progesterone have lower cardiovascular risk. A personalized assessment when initiating MHT should consider age, time since menopause, baseline cardiovascular (CV) risk, and choice of MHT formulation. Assessment of baseline CV risk should include a comprehensive review of traditional CV risk factors and consideration of risk-enhancing factors (including female-specific risk factors) and imaging for subclinical atherosclerosis (i.e. coronary artery calcium scoring) to provide a person-centered risk assessment. Menopause is an important period to implement prevention strategies to reduce future incidence CVD. A structured, individualized approach that accounts for the timing, formulation and delivery of MHT can optimize cardiovascular safety. This review provides a framework for personalized decision-making and highlights the need for further research to clarify MHT's impact on long-term CV outcomes.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesEstrogen Replacement TherapyHormone Replacement TherapyMenopauseFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAlgorithmASCVDCardiovascular riskHormoneMenopausal hormone therapy (MHT)Menopause

Identifiers

PMID41066010
PMCPMC12511246

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.