Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41066166›Full record

Trial reportJMIR mHealth and uHealth2025

Cerina-Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-Based Mobile App for Managing Generalized Anxiety Disorder Symptoms Among University Students: Results From a Pilot Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.

Ozlem Eylem-van Bergeijk, Tony Robinson, Matthew Manktelow, Michail Olympios, Siobhan Poulter, Prasannajeet Mane, Maria Panagioti, Joan Condell, Gerard Leavey

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06146530 (Cerina- Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Based Mobile Application for Managing GAD Symptoms), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06146530 naunknown statusnot on this map

Cerina- Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Based Mobile Application for Managing GAD Symptoms: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCerina TherapeuticsRan2023 to 2024Enrolled90ConditionsTreatment Adherence, Generalized Anxiety, Treatment Adherence and ComplianceArmsTreatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ozlem Eylem-van BergeijkDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5695-9523
Tony RobinsonSchool of Computing, Engineering and Intelligent Systems Human Centred Computing, Intelligent Systems Research Centre, Ulster University, Londonderry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0623-306X
Matthew ManktelowSchool of Computing, Engineering and Intelligent Systems Human Centred Computing, Intelligent Systems Research Centre, Ulster University, Londonderry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4158-8480
Michail OlympiosFaculty of Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8538-0408
Siobhan PoulterSchool of Computing, Engineering and Intelligent Systems Human Centred Computing, Intelligent Systems Research Centre, Ulster University, Londonderry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2119-0173
Prasannajeet ManeCerina Health, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7434-5773
Maria PanagiotiDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7153-5745
Joan CondellSchool of Computing, Engineering and Intelligent Systems Human Centred Computing, Intelligent Systems Research Centre, Ulster University, Londonderry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3517-2182
Gerard LeaveyThe Bamford Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing, School of Psychology, Ulster University, Londonderry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8411-8919

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneralized anxiety disorder (GAD) is common among university students due to academic pressure and financial uncertainty, among other challenges. Despite the need, the receipt of available psychological services is often low.

objectiveThis study investigates the feasibility of a digital unguided cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based mobile app, Cerina, and examines the likely effects of this intervention in reducing GAD symptoms compared to the waitlist control group.

methodsEligible students (n=158) with mild to moderate GAD symptoms were self-assessed through web-based questionnaires and were randomly allocated to the intervention group (n=79) or to the waitlist control group (n=79) following their informed consent. The intervention group had direct access to Cerina and followed CBT-based interactive sessions for 6 weeks. The waitlist control group participants had access to optional on-campus well-being services, and they were given access to Cerina 6 weeks after their randomization. Participants completed assessments on anxiety, depression, worry, and usability at three time points. Additionally, upon completing the intervention, they were invited to a web-based interview to understand the implementation of the intervention in more depth.

resultsOn average, 13% (10/79) intervention group participants dropped out, 61% (36/69) completed the core clinical content (2 sessions), and 12% (7/69) completed the desired number of sessions (6 or 7 sessions). Analyses of the completers (2 or more sessions) revealed significant group differences in GAD (mean 8.4, SD 3.7; t

conclusionsThe Cerina app showed promising results in reducing GAD symptoms among students. This result supports findings from other randomized controlled trials showing that digital CBT-based interventions are effective and feasible for a wide range of age groups and populations experiencing GAD symptoms. The low number of participants completing the recommended number of sessions suggests a usability issue. To address this, the intervention could be refined through an iterative design process informed by user feedback, and the long-term impact of specific engagement features in improving usability and retention could be assessed through extended evaluations.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06146530; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06146530. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083554.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersCognitive Behavioral TherapyMobile ApplicationsStudentsAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleGeneralized Anxiety DisorderHumansMalePilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung AdultCBTcognitive behavioral therapyfeasibility RCTgeneralized anxiety disordermHealthmobile healthrandomized controlled trialstudents

Identifiers

PMID41066166
PMCPMC12550456

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.