ArticlePloS one2025
The role of passion and affect in adolescents' basketball participation: A self-determination theory perspective.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined adolescent basketball participation through the lens of Self-Determination Theory (SDT), focusing on the roles of passion (harmonious and obsessive) and affect (positive and negative), with gender and age as moderators. We collected data from 400 Chinese adolescents from south of China using convenience sampling (M age = 15.20, SD = 1.99). Participants completed the Passion Scale and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Scale (PANAS). Basketball participation was operationalized as self-reported engagement in basketball over the past seven days. Hypothesized pathways were tested using structural equation modeling (SEM) in Mplus, which included test of measurement invariance and moderation. Results revealed that harmonious passion positively predicted basketball engagement (β = .280, 95% CI [.127,.432], p = .003) though enhanced positive affect. Specifically, harmonious passion was positively associated with positive affect (β = .495, 95% CI [.356,.635], p < .001), which, in turn, predicted basketball engagement (β = .253, 95% CI [.132,.373], p = .001). In contrast, obsessive passion was linked to negative affect (β = .196, 95% CI [.083,.310], p = .004) but showed no direct effect on basketball participation. While no significant gender differences were observed, age differences emerged. Specifically, the pathways from both harmonious and obsessive passion to basketball engagement were stronger among junior high school students compared to their senior high school counterparts. This study revealed that harmonious passion and positive affect play pivotal roles in sustaining adolescent basketball participation, whereas obsessive passion's negative emotional consequences may undermine engagement. The findings underscore the importance of interventions designed to promote harmonious passion and positive affect, particularly for senior high students facing academic pressures. Given the cross-sectional design and sampling from southern China, the generalizability of our findings to other cultural contexts or regions of China should be interpreted with caution. Additionally, due to the less-than-ideal model fit in multi-group analyses examining gender as a moderator, results concerning gender differences require the same cautious approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.