Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41068971›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2025

Unsupervised feature extraction using deep learning empowers discovery of genetic determinants of the electrocardiogram.

Ewa Sieliwonczyk, Arunashis Sau, Konstantinos Patlatzoglou, Kathryn A McGurk, Libor Pastika, Prisca K Thami, Massimo Mangino, Sean L Zheng, George Powell, Lara Curran and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Ewa Sieliwonczyk *National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, SW3 6LY, UK.
Arunashis Sau *National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, SW3 6LY, UK.
Konstantinos PatlatzoglouNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, SW3 6LY, UK.
Kathryn A McGurkNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, SW3 6LY, UK.
Libor PastikaNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, SW3 6LY, UK.
Prisca K ThamiNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, SW3 6LY, UK.
Massimo ManginoNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, SW3 6LY, UK.
Sean L ZhengNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, SW3 6LY, UK.
George PowellNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, SW3 6LY, UK.
Lara CurranNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, SW3 6LY, UK.
Rachel J BuchanNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, SW3 6LY, UK.
Pantazis TheotokisNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, SW3 6LY, UK.
Nicholas S PetersNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, SW3 6LY, UK.
Bart LoeysUniversity of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Daniel B KramerHarvard-Thorndike Electrophysiology Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jonathan W WaksHarvard-Thorndike Electrophysiology Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Fu Siong Ng *National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, SW3 6LY, UK. f.ng@imperial.ac.uk.
James S Ware *National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, SW3 6LY, UK. j.ware@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/CRTF/21/24183Medical Research Council MR/Y000803/1Sir Jules Thorn Charitable Trust 21JTA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectrocardiograms (ECGs) are widely used to assess cardiac health, but traditional clinical interpretation relies on a limited set of human-defined parameters. While advanced data-driven methods can outperform analyses of conventional ECG features for some tasks, they often lack interpretability. Variational autoencoders (VAEs), a form of unsupervised machine learning, can address this limitation by extracting ECG features that are both comprehensive and interpretable, known as latent factors. These latent factors provide a low-dimensional representation optimised to capture the full informational content of the ECG. The aim of this study was to develop a deep learning model to learn these latent ECG features, and to use this optimised feature set in genetic analyses to identify fundamental determinants of cardiac electrical function. This approach has the potential to expand our understanding of cardiac electrophysiology by uncovering novel phenotypic and genetic relationships.

methodsOur novel VAE model was trained on a dataset comprising over one million secondary care median beat ECGs, with external validation in the UK Biobank (UKB). We performed common and rare variant association studies for VAE latent factors and conventional ECG traits on quality-controlled UKB data. Associated genetic variants were compared to loci for conventional ECG parameters available in the UKB and literature. Loci were considered novel if they were not previously associated with ECG traits in the GWAS Catalog and showed no known associations in nearby genes based on literature review. Novel GWAS associations were validated in a withheld subset of the UKB cohort. Additionally, we compared the associations of the VAE latent factors and conventional ECG traits with phenotypic traits, disease codes, and echocardiographic traits.

resultsThe VAE identified 20 independent latent factors that captured ECG morphology with high accuracy (mean Pearson correlation: 0.95). GWAS of latent factors identified 65 unique loci, including 27 novel regions not associated with conventional ECG parameters in the same dataset. Six novel loci were not associated with the ECG in previous larger GWAS studies, including genes implicated in cardiac function and remodelling. Rare variant analysis identified seven additional genes with links to cardiac electrophysiology and remodelling. Phenotypic analyses revealed stronger and more comprehensive associations for latent factors compared to conventional traits, particularly for echocardiographic measures and cardiac phenotypes. Visualisations of latent factor alterations highlighted the interpretability of this approach.

conclusionsOur study shows that the VAE provides a valuable tool for advancing our understanding of cardiac function and its genetic underpinnings, outperforming traditional approaches in genetic and phenotypic discovery.

Indexed as

Deep LearningElectrocardiographyUnsupervised Machine LearningFemaleHumansMalePhenotypeBurden testingDeep learningECGGWASPheWASVariational autoencoder

Identifiers

PMID41068971
PMCPMC12512816

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.