Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41070490›Full record

ArticleTurk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry2025

Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Psychiatric Service Use Among Psychiatric Outpatients.

Cengiz Kiliç, Özge Türkoğlu, Kezban Burcu Avanoğlu, Psidemi Çalışma Grubu, Elif Anil Yağcioğlu, Berna Diclenur Uluğ

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cengiz Kiliç
Özge Türkoğlu
Kezban Burcu Avanoğlu
Psidemi Çalışma Grubu
Elif Anil Yağcioğlu
Berna Diclenur Uluğ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBoth general medical and mental health services were disrupted during the pandemic. It is unclear how these disruptions played out for people with various mental health diagnoses. We compared change in mental health status and use of mental health services between four psychiatric groups: schizophrenia spectrum disorders, bipolar disorder, unipolar depression, and anxiety/obsessive- compulsive disorder (OCD).

methodUsing a semi-structured interview, 492 outpatients with psychiatric disorders who had used psychiatric services at a university hospital before the pandemic were assessed on the phone during the pandemic.

resultsAbout half of the sample reported a need for contact with mental health services during the pandemic, half of whom actually used services. Need for contact was much lower in the schizophrenia group than other diagnostic groups, whereas actual use of services was lower in the unipolar depression and anxiety/OCD groups.

conclusionsPatients with severe mental disorders, such as schizophrenia or bipolar disorders, may not be in a more disadvantageous position in terms of psychiatric service use during the pandemic. The pandemic response structure of mental health services should be modified to fit the needs of anxiety/depression spectrum patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesOutpatientsAdultBipolar DisorderFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSchizophreniaTurkeyCOVID-19Mental HealthOutpatient Services Use.Pandemic

Identifiers

PMID41070490
PMCPMC11987551

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.