Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41070620›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of oncology2025

Emerging insights into alternative end‑joining: Mechanisms, genome instability and therapeutic opportunities in cancer (Review).

Nasir Azam, Xiangyu Liu, Xinghan Li, Lin Ma, Qi Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nasir AzamLaboratory of Molecular Radiation Medicine, International Cancer Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, P.R. China.
Xiangyu LiuLaboratory of Molecular Radiation Medicine, International Cancer Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, P.R. China.
Xinghan LiDepartment of Stomatology, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, P.R. China.
Lin MaDepartment of Stomatology, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, P.R. China.
Qi LiuLaboratory of Molecular Radiation Medicine, International Cancer Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome instability is a central hallmark of cancer, driven by aberrant DNA damage responses that facilitate tumor evolution and resistance to therapy. Although canonical non‑homologous end joining and homologous recombination are well‑characterized pathways for repairing DNA double‑strand breaks (DSBs), recent advances have revealed that cancer cells increasingly depend on alternative end‑joining (alt‑EJ) to survive persistent DNA damage that arises from intrinsic stresses or external therapies. Alt‑EJ, characterized by its reliance on microhomologous sequences at DSB sites, promotes mutation accumulation and chromosomal rearrangements, thereby driving genomic instability and tumor progression. Despite its pivotal role in cancer biology, the molecular regulation, contextual determinants and dualistic role of alt‑EJ in maintaining genome integrity compared with promoting instability remain incompletely understood. The present review integrated the latest mechanistic insights into alt‑EJ, elucidated its regulatory networks and interactions with canonical DSB repair pathways and discussed its consequences for cancer genome integrity and evolution. Furthermore, it highlighted the emerging potential of alt‑EJ as a therapeutic vulnerability for cancer, underscoring the urgent need to translate these discoveries into innovative treatment strategies aimed at overcoming therapy resistance and improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

DNA End-Joining RepairGenomic InstabilityNeoplasmsAnimalsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairHumansalternative end‑joiningcancer therapeutic targetsDNA damage responseDNA double strand break repairgenome instability

Identifiers

PMID41070620
PMCPMC12543316

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.