ArticleJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2026
Automated abdominal aortic calcification and trabecular bone score independently predict incident fracture during routine osteoporosis screening.
Article in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Abdominal aortic calcification and skeletal outcomes in hospitalized patients with surgically treated fragility fractures: a retrospective cohort study.Archives of osteoporosis · 2026Article
- Abdominal aortic calcification as an opportunistic marker of reduced CT-derived vertebral bone density in osteoporotic vertebral fractures.Brain & spine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC), a marker of subclinical cardiovascular disease, has previously shown to be associated with low BMD and fracture. However, it remains unclear whether AAC is associated with trabecular bone score (TBS), a gray-level textural measure, or whether it predicts fracture risk independent of this measure. Here, we examined the cross-sectional association of AAC scored using a validated machine learning algorithm (ML-AAC24) with TBS, and their simultaneous associations with incident fractures in 7691 individuals (93.4% women) through the Manitoba BMD Registry (mean age 75.3 yr). The association between ML-AAC24 and TBS was tested using generalized linear regression. Cox proportional hazards models tested the simultaneous relationships of ML-AAC24 and TBS with incident fractures. At baseline, 41.3% of the study cohort had low (<2), 32.4% had moderate (2 to <6), and 26.3% had high (≥6) ML-AAC24. Compared to low ML-AAC24, high ML-AAC24 was associated with a 0.81% lower TBS in the multivariable-adjusted model. Independent of each other and multiple established fracture risk factors, ML-AAC24 and TBS were each associated with an increased risk of incident fractures. Specifically, high ML-AAC24 (HR 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.73, compared to low ML-AAC24) and lower TBS (HR 1.13, 95% CI: 1.05-1.22, per SD decrease) were associated with increased relative hazards for any incident fracture. High ML-AAC24 and lower TBS were also associated with incident major osteoporotic fracture (HR 1.48, 95% CI: 1.18-1.87 and HR 1.15, 95% CI: 1.06-1.25, respectively) and hip fracture (HR 1.56, 95% CI: 1.05-2.31 and HR 1.25, 95% CI: 1.08-1.44, respectively). In conclusion, high ML-AAC24 is associated with lower TBS in older adults attending routine osteoporosis screening. Both measures were associated with incident fractures. The findings of this study highlight high ML-AAC24, seen in more than 1 in 4 of the study cohort, and lower TBS provide complementary prognostic information for fracture risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.