ReviewThe Journal of physiology2025
The what, which, when, why and who of Off responses in the auditory system.
Review in The Journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For decades, the Off responses noted in the auditory system from the cochlear nucleus up to the secondary auditory cortex have been largely ignored. Over the last few years, several studies have reinvigorated interest in Off responses in the auditory system and described their cellular mechanisms and the plasticity they display during various behaviours. While it is possible to design tasks where Off responses are necessary for an animal's behavioural performance, we posit that it is the interplay of On and Off responses that the brain uses more generally to enable sound feature perception, including sound duration and sound offset detection. Moreover, based upon close examination of the latencies and durations of published Off responses, we propose here that two different types of Off responses should be considered. We suggest that short latency-short duration responses participate in the neural coding of acoustic parameters whose estimates cannot be obtained on the sole basis of onset features. Meanwhile, long latency-long duration responses potentially reflect more cognitive variables associated with the learned use of a particular stimulus in a behavioural context. Proposing two varieties of Off responses draws attention to the need to better characterize post-stimulus firing in future studies to more definitively distinguish divergent mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.