ReviewJournal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN2026
How to Cure Autoimmune GN and Podocytopathies.
Review in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Repeat kidney biopsy in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis and suspected kidney relapse.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autoimmune GN and podocytopathies are immune-mediated kidney diseases with different clinical presentations and histotypes. Traditionally, proteinuria and histotypes are used for prognosis prediction and hence define intensity of immunotherapy. Renin-angiotensin system and sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors are considered as "supportive care," and control of proteinuria seems a primary treatment goal without reasoning the cause of proteinuria. We propose to refine these concepts based on the shared pathophysiology of these diseases: ( 1 ) Disease acuity as the primary determinant of therapy. Rapidly progressive GN, relapsing GN, and chronic GN require different priorities. Rapidly progressive GN depends on the level and nephrotoxicity of the involved antibodies and complement activation and may require immediate complement inhibition, and antibody removal from the circulation before a B-cell-targeting therapy is initiated to control de novo autoantibody production. ( 2 ) Relapsing or chronically active disease need long-term control of immunologic activity with a B-cell-targeting monotherapy, in case of single autoreactive lymphocyte clones, for example, in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies vasculitis or antinephrin/anti-M-type phospholipase A2 receptor-nephrotic syndrome. By contrast, diseases with numerous autoantigens/clones, i.e ., lupus nephritis or antiphospholipid syndrome should benefit from combination therapies, similar to kidney transplantation. ( 3 ) All forms of GN and most relapsing podocytopathies lead to glomerulosclerosis and nephron loss, i.e ., CKD. This implies CKD management following the latest Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes CKD risk matrix and treatment recommendations. In relapsing GN/podocytopathies, CKD care is the second treatment priority; in chronic GNs, it becomes the first treatment priority in contrast to "supportive care." In relapsing and chronic disease, proteinuria levels may represent activity, CKD, or both; hence, proteinuria alone does not inform treatment choices. This review aims to overcome existing hurdles by redefining treatment priorities in GNs and podocytopathies based on the underlying autoimmune pathomechanisms to define immunotherapy and by implementing CKD care for conceptual clarity and better long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.