ArticlePloS one2025
SHAP-enhanced machine learning identifies modifiable obesity predictors across adolescent weight groups: A 2021 YRBSS analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relationships between vigorous physical activity and psychological complaints in adolescents: findings from 240,951 participants.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Explainable Machine Learning for Risk Prediction of Reduced Quality of Life in Hypertension.Vascular health and risk management · 2026Article
- Correlates of muscle strengthening exercise in adolescents: A machine learning based analysis.PloS one · 2026Article
- No or low self-reported moderate to vigorous physical activity among Chinese children and adolescents: a large-scale cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe growing prevalence of obesity in adolescents around the world poses a major threat to public health. This research uses machine learning models to examine the main causes of obesity, in contrast to standard information that typically rely on a single chance. The important fat-related steps were identified and ranked in this assessment to provide information on the effectiveness of the expected solutions.
methodsData from the 2021 Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) were used in a cross-sectional analysis of adolescents aged 12-18 years. Random Forest and XGBoost models were implemented to investigate behavioral, dietary, sleep, and substance use factors. Model interpretability was enhanced using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).
resultsBreakfast frequency, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) days, sleep duration, fruit intake, and screen time emerged as the most important predictors of obesity, with vaping also contributing to risk. Random Forest achieved an accuracy of 66.4% and XGBoost 66.3%, both with modest discriminative ability (AUC ~ 0.58). Fewer MVPA days, lower breakfast frequency, shorter sleep duration, lower fruit intake, and longer screen time were associated with increased obesity risk. SHAP analysis confirmed breakfast frequency and MVPA days as the top-ranked factors.
conclusionMachine learning models identified key predictors of adolescent obesity, providing insights into the complex interplay of behavioral and lifestyle factors. Public health strategies should prioritize daily breakfast and fruit consumption, regular physical activity, sufficient sleep, reduced screen time, and vaping prevention to mitigate rising obesity rates among adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.