Evidence mapPaperPMID 41072012Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

User Engagement With and Perceived Impact of a Digital Cognitive Training App on Cognition, Daily Functioning, and Mental Fitness: Secondary Analysis of Cross-Sectional Survey Data.

Kelsey McAlister, Lara Baez, Anna Braunsdorf, Yana Yang, Dan Kessler, Jennifer Huberty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kelsey McAlisterFit Minded, Inc, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1548-4936
Lara BaezFit Minded, Inc, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3342-2325
Anna BraunsdorfThe Mind Company, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-4883-4159
Yana YangThe Mind Company, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-9355-9386
Dan KesslerThe Mind Company, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0009-0007-5291-3601
Jennifer HubertyFit Minded, Inc, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0276-4640

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive difficulties are common and can interfere with daily functioning. While digital cognitive training apps are widely used, few studies have examined whether personalized tools support perceived improvements in cognitive functioning, daily functioning, and overall mental fitness among general adult users.

objectiveThe purpose of this secondary analysis was to explore the self-reported cognitive benefits of Elevate, a commercial, personalized cognitive training app developed to support cognitive functioning, as well as engagement with the app. We aimed to (1) describe demographics, engagement metrics, and self-reported improvements; (2) examine associations between app engagement and self-reported improvements in cognitive functioning skills directly targeted by the app; and (3) examine associations between app engagement and self-reported improvements in daily functioning and overall mental fitness as potential transfer effects of cognitive training.

methodsAdult Elevate users (aged ≥18 years) who used the app at least twice in the previous 30 days completed a brief web-based survey on perceived cognitive, functional, and mental fitness improvements. Responses were linked to objective app use data, including total active weeks, mean active days per week, and mean time per day. Ordinal logistic regressions tested associations between engagement metrics and self-reported outcomes controlling for demographic variables. A Bonferroni correction was applied to adjust for multiple comparisons.

resultsA total of 3367 adult Elevate users were included. Participants were primarily middle-aged (mean 55, SD 16 y), White (2557/3336, 76.65%), and female (2184/3362, 64.96%), with 67.72% (2274/3358) holding at least a college degree. Using the app across more weeks was associated with a greater likelihood of reporting improvements in all cognitive skills (odds ratios [ORs] 1.0014-1.0027, 95% CI 1.0006-1.0036), several areas of daily functioning (eg, motivation and task efficiency; ORs 1.0014-1.0017, 95% CI 1.0006-1.0026), and overall mental fitness (OR 1.0021, 95% CI 1.0012-1.0031). More days of use per week were linked to improvement in math only (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.09-1.22), whereas spending more time per day was associated with improvements in speaking, reading, math, motivation, personal progress, and mental fitness (ORs 1.02-1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.06).

conclusionsGreater use of the Elevate app was linked to self-reported improvements in cognitive skills, daily functioning, and overall mental fitness. These findings suggest that personalized, adaptive cognitive training apps such as Elevate may serve as scalable tools for enhancing everyday cognitive and functional well-being. Future research should use rigorous, longitudinal methods to confirm these effects and clarify which app features drive meaningful outcomes.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingCognitionMobile ApplicationsAdultAgedCognitive TrainingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultapp-based interventioncognitive functioningdigital healthmental performancemobile healthreal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID41072012
PMCPMC12552828

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.