ReviewJournal of evidence-based medicine2025
Two-Way Referrals in Chinese Medical Consortia Under the Framework of Hierarchical Diagnosis and Treatment: Progress and Challenges.
Review in Journal of evidence-based medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants of occupational burnout among medical personnel in tertiary hospitals: the complex interplay of demographic characteristics, mental health, and self-efficacy.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Developing an integrated dementia care model using service blueprinting: process visualization and failure point analysis.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Association of DRG-based payment reform with inpatient costs and resource use among older adults: an interrupted time series study in a county-level referral hospital in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Inhaled therapy guidance competency among respiratory nurses across hospital tiers in Eastern China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Two-Way Referrals in Chinese Medical Consortia Under the Framework of Hierarchical Diagnosis and Treatment: Progress and Challenges.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system's two-way referral mechanism is crucial for optimizing medical resource allocation, with medical consortia significantly enhancing this process. It evaluates the implementation dynamics of two-way referral systems within China's medical consortia from 2019 to 2024, focusing on policy evolution, regional disparities, and stakeholder engagement. Despite a positive overall trend, referral rates remain low, with notable regional and institutional disparities. The implementation outcomes span various dimensions, including referral metrics, specific services, timing, and costs; however, these effects are inconsistent and warrant further investigation. The current evaluation index system is diverse but tends to prioritize quantity over quality. Additionally, awareness and satisfaction levels among medical personnel and patients regarding the two-way referral system are uneven and influenced by multiple factors. Currently, China's two-way referral system faces challenges, including low referral volumes, an inadequate evaluation framework, limited research perspectives, and insufficient motivation for stakeholder participation. Future efforts should focus on strengthening primary care infrastructure, enhancing resource collaboration, advancing health insurance reforms, refining the evaluation system, and fostering synergy between hierarchical diagnosis and treatment, the Healthy China strategy, and referral model innovation to advance the hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system. Recommendations emphasize strengthening primary care capacity, reforming insurance payment models, and leveraging digital health technologies to align with the "Healthy China 2030" strategic goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.