SynthesisJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2025
Do Incretin-Based Therapies Influence the Risk of Cholangiocarcinoma in Type 2 Diabetes Patients? Insights from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIncretin-based therapies, including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4Is), are widely used in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, concerns have emerged regarding their potential association with an increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and current evidence remains inconclusive. This review aims to evaluate and clarify the association between incretin-based therapies and the risk of CCA in patients with T2DM.
methodsThis review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42025641616). A comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, ProQuest, EBSCOhost, Wiley, and SAGE databases. Eligible observational studies reporting the association between incretin-based therapies and CCA were included. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using RevMan with a random-effects model.
resultFour studies (three cohort and one case-control) were included. The pooled HRs showed no significant association between incretin-based therapies and CCA risk, with estimates of 1.07 (95% CI: 0.70-1.63) for GLP-1RAs and 1.05 (95% CI: 0.83-1.34) for DPP-4Is. Pooled RR analyses yielded similarly non-significant results. All included studies were assessed as having a low risk of bias according to the NOS.
conclusionIncretin-based therapies do not significantly increase the risk of CCA in T2DM patients. Within the limitations of the available observational evidence, these findings provide reassurance regarding their safety profile, while highlighting the need for ongoing pharmacovigilance and further large-scale studies to confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41075111What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.