ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2025
Does Ivermectin Pollute the Surroundings of Swine Farms?
Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Does Ivermectin Pollute the Surroundings of Swine Farms?Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pharmaceuticals are emerging environmental pollutants, with macrocyclic lactones like ivermectin raising concerns due to their widespread use and persistence. This study investigated ivermectin residues in intensive swine farms in Emilia-Romagna, Italy, focusing on treated sows' faeces and environmental samples. Two farms using ivermectin and a control farm without antiparasitic drugs were studied. Faecal, slurry, soil, and wastewater samples were collected at three treatment points: before, and 1 and 10 days post-treatment. Ivermectin was administered either orally or by injection and analysed via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Faecal residues varied significantly with administration route: orally treated sows had higher concentrations in faeces shortly after treatment (median = 930.25 µg kg
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.