ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2025
Effects and Complications of Hip Arthroplasty After Failure of Internal Fixation in Stable and Unstable Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveConversion to hip arthroplasty (cHA) is a widely utilized and effective surgical intervention for addressing the failure of internal fixation in intertrochanteric femoral fractures (FIF-INF). Although previous studies have confirmed that the failure rate of internal fixation is higher in unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures, but whether the efficacy and complications of cHA after failure differ from those in stable fractures remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiological outcomes, as well as the incidence of complications associated with hip arthroplasty over a minimum follow-up period of 3 years after the failure of internal fixation in both stable and unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures.
methodsThis multicenter study retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent hip arthroplasty subsequent to the failure of FIF-INF from December 2012 to December 2020 at various participating research centers. Cases demonstrating excellent and acceptable quality fracture reduction, as defined by the criteria established by Chang et al., were included. According to AO/OTA classification criteria of intertrochanteric fractures, the fractures were classified into stable fractures (31-A1) and unstable fractures (31-A2, A3). There were 47 patients with stable fractures and 56 patients with unstable fractures. Clinical and radiological evaluations were conducted for all patients. This study employed independent samples t-tests, χ
resultsA total of 103 patients were analyzed. The HHS in the stable group improved from a preoperative mean of 47.08 ± 5.50 to 89.13 ± 4.75 at the final follow-up, whereas that in the unstable group increased from 45.43 ± 6.36 to 83.87 ± 4.67. The improvement scores for the stable and unstable groups were 42.05 ± 4.69 and 38.81 ± 3.06, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001). VAS scores decreased from the preoperative levels of 7.13 ± 0.92 and 7.61 ± 0.82 to 2.36 ± 0.87 and 2.91 ± 0.79, respectively, indicating a significant reduction in pain in both groups; however, the unstable group reported more severe postoperative pain (p = 0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications following cHA was significantly greater in the unstable group (28.57%) than in the stable group (10.64%) (p = 0.047).
conclusioncHA is an effective treatment modality for the failure of internal fixation in intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Compared with stable fractures, patients with initial unstable fractures that have failed experience a greater incidence of postoperative complications, relatively poorer joint function, and more pronounced pain following cHA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.