ReviewDigital health
Prediction of new-onset atrial fibrillation in sepsis patients by machine learning: A systematic review.
Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-driven risk prediction of polypharmacy in older adults: current advances, clinical applications, and future perspectives.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) occurs in approximately 23% of patients with sepsis and is independently associated with increased mortality. Therefore, early prediction of NOAF has significant clinical value. However, current artificial intelligence (AI) models predominantly rely on tabular data. These unimodal AI models face limitations in predicting NOAF as they fail to fully utilize the predictive potential arising from the interplay of multimodal data. Methods: We reviewed current Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) approaches for atrial fibrillation (AF) prediction. It summarizes the selected features in ML models for predicting AF in ICU patients, and the advantages of time-window selection in DL models using electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. Notably, we compared these models in terms of feature selection, prediction horizons, and performance when applied to tabular data and ECG signal features. To enhance the predictive capability of ML for NOAF in patients with sepsis, we drew inspiration from multimodal models developed for other diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease, and proposed integrating tabular data and ECG signal data within a multimodal framework. Results: This study systematically analyzed the application of ML and DL in AF prediction. After screening, 12 studies (6 ML, 6 DL) were included. ML models, based on electronic medical records (EMR) or ECG features, achieved prediction windows ranging from minutes to hours with AUCs of 0.74-0.90. DL models processing raw ECG signals extended prediction windows to days, achieving AUCs of 0.74-0.96, with performance improving with larger datasets. A Transformer-based multimodal model (integrating clinical data and ECG) was proposed to enhance AF prediction in sepsis patients, though further validation is needed for cross-modal data fusion feasibility. Conclusions: Transitioning from unimodal predictive models to multimodal frameworks that combine tabular clinical data and raw ECG signals is feasible within the current deep-learning framework. This approach has the potential to significantly improve the early prediction capabilities of NOAF in sepsis patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.