ReviewNeuro-oncology practice2025
Bevacizumab for symptomatic cerebral radiation necrosis after radiation of high-grade glioma or brain metastases - when and for whom?
Review in Neuro-oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epilepsy in Patients with Cerebral Radiation Necrosis: A Scoping Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Radiomitigators: Breakthroughs in Post-Radiation Recovery.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Mechanisms, Imaging Phenotypes, and Therapeutic Advances of Neovascularization in Brain Metastases.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Advances in the prevention and treatment of radiation-induced brain necrosis: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral radiation necrosis (CRN) is a serious complication of high-dose radiotherapy in patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) and brain metastases (BM). Approximately half of the patients with radiological CRN develop debilitating neurological symptoms that significantly affect their neurocognitive functioning, performance status, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), requiring treatment. While corticosteroids are the standard first-line treatment for symptomatic CRN (sCRN), they have considerable drawbacks, including limited efficacy, severe side effects affecting various organ systems, and interference with concurrent therapies, such as immunotherapy. Prolonged corticosteroid use can lead to adrenal insufficiency and dependence on hormone replacement. Bevacizumab has been shown to reduce the contrast-enhancing CRN lesion on MRI and surrounding edema, improving clinical outcomes in most patients. However, most evidence comes from smaller, single-center, retrospective studies focusing on short-term radiological and clinical outcomes, typically in patients already treated with corticosteroids. Information on the optimal timing of bevacizumab administration and its long-term effects and impact on patient-reported outcomes, including HRQoL, is lacking. These limitations prevented the adoption of first-line bevacizumab treatment for sCRN in international guidelines and insurance coverage policies. A well-powered prospective clinical trial comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of first-line bevacizumab versus corticosteroids in HGG and BM patients is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.