Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41080204›Full record

ReviewNeuro-oncology practice2025

Bevacizumab for symptomatic cerebral radiation necrosis after radiation of high-grade glioma or brain metastases - when and for whom?

Lente L Kroon, Edith M T Dieleman, Vera C Keil, Marit van Barreveld, Marcel G W Dijkgraaf, Laurens Topff, Sander N Wagemakers, Tom J Snijders, Maaike J Vos, Johan A F Koekkoek and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuro-oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Radiomitigators: Breakthroughs in Post-Radiation Recovery.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lente L KroonDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Edith M T DielemanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vera C KeilCancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marit van BarreveldDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4672-2477
Marcel G W DijkgraafDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Laurens TopffDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sander N WagemakersDepartment of Neurology, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, The Netherlands.
Tom J SnijdersDepartment of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maaike J VosDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Johan A F KoekkoekDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Lukas J A StalpersDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Filip Y F L de VosDepartment of Medical Oncology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Dieta BrandsmaDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7998-9904

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral radiation necrosis (CRN) is a serious complication of high-dose radiotherapy in patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) and brain metastases (BM). Approximately half of the patients with radiological CRN develop debilitating neurological symptoms that significantly affect their neurocognitive functioning, performance status, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), requiring treatment. While corticosteroids are the standard first-line treatment for symptomatic CRN (sCRN), they have considerable drawbacks, including limited efficacy, severe side effects affecting various organ systems, and interference with concurrent therapies, such as immunotherapy. Prolonged corticosteroid use can lead to adrenal insufficiency and dependence on hormone replacement. Bevacizumab has been shown to reduce the contrast-enhancing CRN lesion on MRI and surrounding edema, improving clinical outcomes in most patients. However, most evidence comes from smaller, single-center, retrospective studies focusing on short-term radiological and clinical outcomes, typically in patients already treated with corticosteroids. Information on the optimal timing of bevacizumab administration and its long-term effects and impact on patient-reported outcomes, including HRQoL, is lacking. These limitations prevented the adoption of first-line bevacizumab treatment for sCRN in international guidelines and insurance coverage policies. A well-powered prospective clinical trial comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of first-line bevacizumab versus corticosteroids in HGG and BM patients is essential.

Indexed as

bevacizumabbrain metastasescerebral radiation necrosiscorticosteroidsglioma

Identifiers

PMID41080204
PMCPMC12508750

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.