ArticleBlood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis2025
Evaluation of an IgG anti-PF4/H chemiluminescent immunoassay in the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
Article in Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predominance of autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in a nephrology department.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening complication of heparin therapy, mediated by immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies targeting platelet factor 4/heparin (PF4/H) complexes. Prompt and accurate diagnosis is critical to ensure appropriate treatment and improve outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the rapid chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG (Werfen) for detecting IgG anti-PF4/H antibodies for HIT diagnosis compared with the Zymutest HIA IgG (Hyphen BioMed) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). This single-center retrospective cohort included all patients with suspected HIT (4Ts score >3). CLIA and ELISA were performed and compared, and results were evaluated against the serotonin-release assay. We included 113 patients with suspected HIT, and HIT was confirmed in 43 (38.1%). Discordant results occurred in 5 patients (4.4%) with confirmed HIT: 3 patients had positive ELISA and negative CLIA, one had both negative ELISA and CLIA, and one had negative ELISA and positive CLIA. CLIA demonstrated a high diagnostic accuracy, with a sensitivity of 90.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82.0-99.4) and specificity of 80.0% (95% CI, 70.6-89.3). ELISA showed a sensitivity of 95.3% (95% CI, 89.1-100.0) and negative predictive value of 96.3% (95% CI, 91.3-100.0) compared with 93.3% (95% CI, 87.0-99.6) for CLIA. No significant difference was observed between the 2 tests for sensitivity or specificity. Positive and negative percent agreements were 86.4% (95% CI, 77.7-95.2) and 96.3% (95% CI, 91.3-101.3), respectively. Overall percent agreement was 91.2% (95% CI, 85.9-96.4). This study supports the utility of CLIA as a rapid diagnostic tool for HIT optimizing clinical decision-making and patient management.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.