Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41081131›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Development of an

He Zhang, Bei Lei, Lihua Wang, Xuan He, Shengguo Jia, Gang Huang, Liu Liu, Wenhui Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

He Zhang *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Bei Lei *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Lihua WangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xuan HeSiemens Healthineers Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Shengguo JiaSiemens Healthineers Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Gang HuangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Liu LiuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wenhui XieDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate prediction of the visceral pleural invasion (VPI) status in stage I peripheral non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) may help patients benefit from surgery and chemotherapy strategies. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) is a combination of CT and FDG PET that reflects not only the FDG PET-associated metabolic features but also the CT-associated anatomic features. The FDG PET/CT radiomics-based model has demonstrated greater accuracy in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment evaluation of tumors compared with those based on CT only, including in NSCLCs. This study aimed to develop an FDG PET/CT-based VPI prediction (VPIP) index for peripheral subpleural NSCLCs ≤3 cm to help design a more rational treatment strategy for small-size NSCLCs. Methods: This retrospective study included 2,383 patients with peripheral subpleural NSCLCs ≤3 cm between August 2016 and February 2022 diagnosed at Shanghai Chest Hospital. The patients were randomly assigned to the modeling and validation cohorts in a 3:1 ratio. Further, 1,691 PET and 1,691 CT radiomics features of tumors were extracted using the Multi-Modality Radiomics software on the syngo.via workstation. The Results: Eventually, 6 PET and 10 CT features were selected to formulate the FDG PET/CT-based VPIP index. The predictive accuracy of the PET/CT-based VPIP index, with a threshold >-1.13 for VPI, was 83.4% and 83.7% in the modeling and validation cohorts, respectively. This accuracy was substantially higher than that based on PET alone (formulated by 15 PET radiomics features) or CT alone (formulated by 12 CT radiomics features) in both the modeling (AUC, 0.926 Conclusions: The VPIP index formulated in this study based on FDG PET/CT in peripheral subpleural NSCLCs ≤3 cm may help develop more rational surgery strategies for small-size NSCLCs.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT)non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)radiomicsvisceral pleural invasion prediction index (VPIP index)visceral pleural invasion (VPI)

Identifiers

PMID41081131
PMCPMC12514670

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.