ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
High-fidelity virtual endovascular aneurysm repair model as a decision-making tool.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Abdominal Stent Graft Numerical Models to Virtually Simulate Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Scoping Review.EJVES vascular forum · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is associated with favorable short-term outcomes; however, its long-term durability can be enhanced through effective decision-making tools. Currently, most clinical decision-making relies on pre-operative CT imaging that does not fully account for vascular deformation or endovascular device behavior. To address this limitation, we present a high-fidelity virtual EVAR model designed to predict procedural outcomes and optimize treatment planning. We used only patient imaging data to reconstruct tissue structures, preserving a non-invasive workflow. Finite element simulations captured the crimping of stent grafts (SGs), navigation of endovascular devices, and SG implantation. Deformation and stored energy were continuously tracked at each procedural step. We validated the model's results against post-operative CT data using an image fusion technique. Compared to the patient's post-operative data, the model showed strong alignment, with a mean modified Hausdorff distance of 1.71 ± 1.40 mm between the simulated and actual lumen centerlines. Additionally, the 1.65 ± 1.13 mm lumen radius error further supports the model's validity. This high-fidelity, automated, and cost-effective framework can serve as a complementary tool for current EVAR pre-planning practices, potentially improving device selection, streamlining navigation roadmaps, reducing complications, and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41082102What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.