ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Impact of the surgical approach on postoperative quality of life.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We sought to investigate if robotic mitral surgery had a positive impact on postoperative quality of life. Patients who underwent isolated mitral repair or replacement in our institution since 2020 were offered to participate. A previously validated quality-of-life questionnaire (SF-36) was given to the patients at different postoperative timeframes (preoperative, 15 days, 3, 6 months after surgery). Patients were divided in 2 groups depending on the surgical approach (robotic-R; n = 85 or video-assisted thoracotomy-VAT; n = 32). Data are presented as counts (percentages) or median (IQR); comparisons were made using the Chi-square test or Mann-Whitney U test. There were no major preoperative differences in clinical or in any of three 8 items between groups, except for a trend toward better physical role in the R-group. In all 15 days, both groups showed declined in physical role and increase in bodily pain; furthermore, vitality, social function, emotional role, and mental health seemed worse in the VAT-group. Three months after surgery, physical function has improved compared to baseline in the R-group but not the VAT-groups. Physical function recovered, but mostly in R-group and both groups improved in pain levels. Finally, at 6 months, most values had return to baseline levels in both groups, except for global health, which is lower in VAT-group. Despite the study limitations, the robotic approach seems to provide a better postoperative recovery and thus and improved quality of life compared to a video-assisted thoracotomy approach. Further studies are needed to confirm the findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41083657What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.