Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41084010›Full record

ArticleMolecular neurodegeneration2025

Cerebrospinal fluid markers link to synaptic plasticity responses and Alzheimer's disease genetic pathways.

Bjørn-Eivind Kirsebom, Johanna Nilsson, Ellen Vromen, Peter Mikael Arnesen, Atle Bjørnerud, Ann Brinkmalm, Geir Bråthen, Gøril Rolfseng Grøntvedt, Jonas Jarholm, Kaja Nordengen and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular neurodegeneration, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Bjørn-Eivind KirsebomDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, 9038, Norway. bjorneivind.kirsebom@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1413-9578
Johanna NilssonDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ellen VromenAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter Mikael ArnesenDepartment of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Atle BjørnerudDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ann BrinkmalmDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Geir BråthenDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, University Hospital of Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway.
Gøril Rolfseng GrøntvedtDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, University Hospital of Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway.
Jonas JarholmDepartment of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Kaja NordengenDepartment of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Lene PålhaugenDepartment of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Per SelnesDepartment of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Nikias SiafarikasDepartment of Geriatric Psychiatry, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Ragnhild Eide SkogsethDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Neuro-SysMed, Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Sandra TecelãoDepartment of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Knut WaterlooDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, 9038, Norway.
Panpan YouDepartment of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Henrik ZetterbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Dag AarslandKing's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.
Betty TijmsAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pieter Jelle VisserAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kaj Blennow *Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Tormod Fladby *Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSynapse loss is linked to cognitive symptoms in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) synaptic biomarkers may clarify disease heterogeneity and disease mechanisms for progression beyond amyloid (Aβ) and tau pathologies, potentially revealing new drug targets.

methodsWe used a mass-spectrometry panel of 17 synaptic biomarkers including neuronal pentraxins (NPTXs) linked to glutamatergic signaling, and 14-3-3 proteins linked to tau-pathology and synaptic plasticity. Synapse markers were evaluated in two independent cohorts: Dementia Disease Initiation (DDI) (n = 346) and Amsterdam Dementia Cohort (n = 397), both with cognitive assessments up to 10 years. We used linear regression to compare synapse marker differences between CSF-determined Aβ + cognitively normal (CN) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) groups, with or without CSF tau pathology (Tau+/-), relative to CN Aβ-/Tau- controls; and associations between synapse markers and medial temporal lobe (MTL) MRI volumetrics in the DDI cohort and with verbal memory in both cohorts. A funneling procedure identified proteins related to Aβ/Tau pathology and memory impairment in both cohorts, which were used to evaluate relations to Aβ/Tau biological progression in the DDI cohort and memory decline in both cohorts. Finally, we explored genetic pathways associated with these synaptic proteins.

resultsIn both cohorts, most markers were elevated in Aβ+/Tau + cases compared to controls, particularly 14-3-3ζ/δ. Several proteins were reduced in Aβ+/Tau- cases, especially NPTX-2, while 14-3-3ζ/δ remained elevated. However, the increase in e.g. 14-3-3ζ/δ and reduction in e.g. NPTX2 were more pronounced in patients with MCI than CN cases regardless of tau-pathology, corresponding to verbal memory impairment and MTL atrophy. Elevated baseline 14-3-3ζ/δ and rab GDP Dissociation Inhibitor Alpha (GDI-1) associated with future progression from Aβ+/Tau- to Aβ+/Tau+. Significant associations (all p < 0.001) were found between 14-3-3 protein genes (YWHAZ, YWHAE) and pathways linked to AD, including the p38 MAPK, IGF, PIK3/AKT and between GDI1 and p38 MAPK upstream pathway (p < 0.05) all connected to synaptic plasticity. Correspondingly, a robust 14-3-3ζ/δ association with future memory decline was observed in both cohorts.

conclusionsReduced markers for excitatory signaling in Aβ+/Tau- and increased synaptic plasticity markers in Aβ+/Tau + cases suggest differential but linked processes underlying disease progression and resilience in the groups.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBiomarkersNeuronal Plasticity14-3-3 ProteinsAgedAged, 80 and overAmyloid beta-PeptidesCognitive DysfunctionCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSynapsestau Proteins14-3-3 ProteinsAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkerstau ProteinsAlzheimer’s diseaseCognitionMemoryNeurodegenerationSynaptic loss

Identifiers

PMID41084010
PMCPMC12519626

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.