Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41084261›Full record

ReviewCurrent pharmaceutical design2026

Determination of Potential Inhibitors against

Manaf AlMatar, Emel Eker, Omar Sajer Naser, Raja Lakhal, Tahani Alkalaf

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pharmaceutical design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Manaf AlMatarBiology Department, Faculty of Education and Arts, Sohar University, Sohar, 311, Sultanate of Oman.
Emel EkerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Harran University, Sanlıurfa, 63300, Turkiye.
Omar Sajer NaserDepartment of Medical Laboratory Techniques, Al-Haweeja Technical Institute, Northern Technical University, Mosul, Iraq.
Raja LakhalBiology Department, Faculty of Education and Arts, Sohar University, Sohar, 311, Sultanate of Oman.
Tahani AlkalafBiology Department, Faculty of Education and Arts, Sohar University, Sohar, 311, Sultanate of Oman.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug development is expensive and time-consuming, and current efforts to lower the process's financial and temporal costs rely increasingly on computational methodologies. Specifically, during emergencies such as the coronavirus 2019 pandemic, the time needed for vaccine and medical research is increased. Computer-aided drug design (CADD) is a powerful tool for discovering potential therapeutic compounds in traditional drug discovery, having surpassed other high-throughput screening methods commonly used in drug development. The advancement of numerous clinically utilized medications has been significantly aided by CADD. CADD can be approached in two main ways: (1) ligand-based (analogue-based) and (2) structurebased (target-based). Both methods utilize molecular mechanics (MM) force fields to represent atomic-level interactions and define molecular shapes, energy, and motion. The two predominant approaches in drug design are structure-based drug design and ligand-based drug design, both of which provide insights into drugreceptor interactions. Therefore, CADD plays a crucial role in identifying suitable pharmacological properties and compatibility, providing a significant advantage in pre-clinical trials. In this review, we reported the use of the computer-aided drug discovery (CADD) technique to suggest new therapeutic targets and possible inhibitor ligands for M. tuberculosis, S. aureus, and H. pylori. The results of the review may be useful in managing the treatment problems brought on by the higher incidence of antibiotic resistance in the aforementioned bacteria.

Indexed as

Alcohol OxidoreductasesAnti-Bacterial AgentsEnzyme InhibitorsHelicobacter pyloriMycobacterium tuberculosisStaphylococcus aureusComputer-Aided DesignDrug DesignDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansAlcohol OxidoreductasesAnti-Bacterial AgentsEnzyme InhibitorsShikimate dehydrogenaseantibiotic.H. pyloriM. tuberculosisS. aureusShikimate dehydrogenasevirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID41084261

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.