Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41084758›Full record

ReviewThe Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology2025

The Effects and Adverse Reactions of Different Bowel Cleansers on Gut Microbiota After Colonoscopy.

Jiabin Hu, Xiongqun Peng, Shuang Cai, Jiaojiao Qiu, Shuxia Wang, Ping Zhu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiabin HuDepartment of Geriatrics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, The Second Medical Center and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, China.
Xiongqun PengDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Changsha Central Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6769-5140
Shuang CaiMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.
Jiaojiao QiuDepartment of Geriatrics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, The Second Medical Center and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, China.
Shuxia WangDepartment of Geriatrics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, The Second Medical Center and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, China.
Ping ZhuDepartment of Geriatrics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, The Second Medical Center and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colonoscopy is a pivotal technique for screening and diagnosing colorectal diseases, particularly colorectal polyps and cancers. Early detection of lesions enables early diagnosis and treatment, thereby improving patient prognosis. The adequacy of bowel preparation is directly related to the quality and effectiveness of colonoscopy. However, the bowel cleansing process may disrupt the balance of gut microbiota, subsequently affecting the host's health status. Currently, there is a relative scarcity of reports on the specific impacts of different types of laxatives on gut microbiota. Therefore, this paper aims to deeply analyze and summarize the effects of various bowel preparations on gut microbiota and their potential adverse reactions following colonoscopy, providing a more comprehensive reference for the selection of bowel preparations in clinical practice.

Indexed as

CatharticsColonoscopyGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansLaxativesCatharticsLaxatives

Identifiers

PMID41084758
PMCPMC12520138

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.