ArticleJournal of molecular histology2025
A prognostic model for gastric cancer constructed by multiple machine learning algorithms.
Article in Journal of molecular histology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) is a highly heterogeneous disease that requires highly accurate prognostic models. Machine learning is a powerful tool for identifying predictive biomarkers and developing prognostic models. Here, we aim to integrate bioinformatics and machine learning algorithms to construct a risk model to predict prognosis of GC patients. Transcriptome data and clinical information of GC patients were obtained from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Microarray data (GSE84437 and GSE26253) were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to screen prognostic genes. The risk genes closely related to prognosis were screened by machine learning algorithms and the risk score was calculated. Kaplan-Meier survival curve, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to verify the validity of the risk model. The protein expression of hub genes in GC tissues was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining. 7 hub genes (CGB5, FEM1A, MATN3, ZNF101, MARCKS, BRI3BP and APOD) were identified and correlated with GC prognosis. A high-precision risk model based on random survival forest (RSF) and generalized boosted regression modelling (GBM) was constructed using these 7 hub genes. The risk model has good predictive ability for GC patients' prognosis, and the risk score could be used as an independent prognostic factor for GC. In addition, the protein expression levels of CGB5, MATN3, MARCKS and APOD in GC tissues were significantly higher than those in normal tissues, and correlated with the pathological characteristics of GC patients. The risk model composed of 7 hub genes can accurately evaluate the prognosis of GC patients, which may contribute to the precise and personalized treatment of GC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41085794What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.